sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuN/topology/physical_package_id exists,īut may contain incorrect information, especially on older ia64 Subject: Create 'slot' sysfs attribute in /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuN/topology/ I'll defer to your judgement on this though. Machines, I get a -1 when I cat the 'physical_package_id' Personally, I don't think this is so bad, since on my legacy HP However, you'll still see the sysfs attribute with a value of -1. Should prevent those annoying messages from appearing. If you don't have _SUN on your machine, this version of the patch > So I guess that the _SUN method isn't there on my machine. > $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/topology/slot Update so that we're checking for a _SUN method underneath theĬPU before blinding stabbing around and trying to call it. I don't think this should be coming from my patch. > messages on my console during boot and the see > When I apply this patch and run it on my tiger, I see a slew > strong movement to make new exported symbols GPL only. > As the author you get to choose the license.

Hrm, I was just following a precedent here.

> I'll wonder why I didn't think of that). > I'm sure that akpm will say 'You could just.

> +#define ref_slot_attr &attr_slot.attr, Well, it wasn't an accident, but I think I did screw up myĪttempt at making this patch a nop on x86. > eventually be needed for an x86 version of this patch). > I assume this slipped in accidentally (though it would

Next in thread: Luck, Tony: 'RE: Create 'slot' sysfs attributein/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuN/topology/'.

Previous message: Casey Schaufler: 'Re: Smack: Do not dereference NULL ipc object'.

Next message: Tilman Schmidt: 'Re: regression: cannot run Postfix sendmail commandas non-root'.

Linux-Kernel Archive: Re: Create 'slot' sysfs attributein/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuN/topology/ Re: Create 'slot' sysfs attributein/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuN/topology/ From: Alex Chiang

Multislot sysfs